In a recent Zoom call, we were placed into breakout rooms with a sentence stem to complete: “What I know is…” The only words that arose for me were: “I know that there are sensings, but what I don’t know is if that which perceives is distinct from those sensings.” In essence, I cannot have experiences without some form of sensory input, and without a perceiver those sensings do not exist as sensings. So, are these two actually distinct or do they arise together as a single feature of consciousness?
As is often the case for me, over several days other ideas began orbiting around this notion, all of them beginning to swirl slowly toward each other. I will weave these together here bit by bit.
I’ll begin with Arthur Koestler’s notion of Holons, which I first heard about via Ken Wilber.
I’m sure many who would read this post are familiar with this concept. It basically states that the physical Universe is made up of “whole-parts.” The standard example is that atoms comprise molecules, which comprise cells, etc. Each is whole in itself, yet is part of a larger whole. Our bodies are part of the Earth, much like our cells are part of our body, though we don’t see it quite like that. Alan Watts said, “We grow out of this world in exactly the same way as the apples grow on the apple tree.” There is no doubt that we arose from the Earth and are also a component of it.
This led my mind to Pierre Teilhard de Chardin’s notion of the “Noosphere.” He posits that this term represents a mental sphere of the planet, arising from the “Biosphere,” which itself arose from the “Geosphere.” He also posits that this Noosphere is moving in an evolutionary trajectory toward an Omega Point, where the diversified Universe will ultimately be re-unified – beginning, in our case, with the Earth. The inference is that human mental energy is the planet, potentially, moving toward at least a similar kind self-awareness as ours. We are, after all, just a bunch of holons arising from this planet in our evolving physical forms. And, if the pattern holds, slowly bringing into form a new more complex holon, much like the cells in our body brought us to our current state. Although I cannot fathom how that might manifest itself, it seems that the way and rate at which we are exchanging mental energy is obviously increasing rapidly. Imagine yourself as a single neuron in the Earth’s emerging brain.
What also came to mind is Ramana Maharshi’s response when he was asked: “How are we to treat others?” His response was: “There are no others.” It is reported that he was in deep meditation in a cave for so long – and was so detached from his body – that insects were eating it, his fingernails were growing long, and his body was wasting away. He was found and brought into the monastery. In the monastery, he was cared for and did eat and speak to people so he could clearly shift his awareness. Or perhaps a “focused point of conscious attention,” as Alan Watts once described the mind, simply moved from one region of attention to another. As we currently understand consciousness, our cells are not aware of the atoms of which they are comprised. To me, this seems no different that Ramana Maharshi’s broader awareness not experiencing his body.
A dear friend once said “Where you put your attention is where life shows itself.” But as noted with Ramana Maharshi, the word “focused” can cover a lot of territory. With that observation, I will go back to the foundational essay upon which I began this blog in 2016: Choice and Appreciation. I would recommend reading it now, but am inserting a portion of it here, as it is useful for the point that I am making.
The Hindus say that the only true statement in the universe is “I am.” The premise, typical of monotheistic religions, is that in the beginning there was just God/Being/Consciousness/Self/Source (fill in your favorite label) or the like; whole, solitary and self-aware.
If we accept the premise that there was conscious awareness, which I will, I would think that the initial creative act that set the physical universe into motion must have been initiated with intent, choice, or at least its energetic equivalent…
… Each point of awareness observes the environs of its locale and, in some way, selects new paths moment by moment, continuing that “downstream” current sourced by its headwaters, Being’s initial intent. Long forgotten in its focus on the immediate is any awareness of all of the upstream perspectives that it has traversed. The momentum of the energetic flow carries it along.
The choice of the next most perfect possible creation, in any particular place, for any particular aspect of the physical universe, must depend upon a particular perspective or set of perspectives from that locale.
I’ll use a worldwide company, like Siemens, as an example. A service technician knows what specific miscellaneous parts and what tools he needs to work on a piece of equipment, and likely his supervisor does too. The technician may prefer a certain specific tool, but his supervisor will factor in the costs, his budget, his perspective of the need, and perhaps a long term cost benefit ratio. The local salesman of the equipment will likely know little or nothing about a tech’s tools, or the minute details of the equipment’s set up or repair; a sales manager will know even less. Going upstream, the general manager of that branch office knows less than the sales manager, a regional manager knows even less and the CEO will know virtually nothing about the minutia that helps a technician do his job. Each in his own arena knows what’s needed for the best performance, based on the view from his level. The CEO is feeding his intentions downstream but it is primarily the folks in each area that determine what’s needed to improve things – make them more perfect – at that level. Yet it is all being driven by the intent of the CEO whose broad perspective is, in turn, not perceptible to our technician.
So, though the overall intent/choice energy stream is fed from Being, in the form and flow of Becoming, the choices of what will make one’s current environment more perfect must, again, be derived individually and locally. We forget the upstream choices in our focus on the immediate choice at hand, like “I’m stopping for groceries.” But those upstream choices are still flowing down to us, as subtle as those experiences may be.
I’m going to stop here for a moment and point to something fundamental about focused attention. When one is focused on any particular thing, everything else has less attention paid to it, and often none at all. Thus, focused attention has a sort of blindness as one of its traits, so no matter how much any particular “I” may be perceiving, it is blind to nearly everything that it is not paying attention to at a given moment. Even appreciation of the created seems displaced when one is fully absorbed in some creative act.
So, if you can fathom all of the creative intent generated in the Big Bang, spreading out over about 13.8 billion years in all directions with all sorts of intertwining on micro and macro levels, it’s easy to see that the most distant choices are those to which we are most blind. They are still sense-able, since their upstream flow is feeding us, but they are so subtle that they reside deep in the apparent stillness that lies within us (very, very long wavelengths).
Now on the one hand, we have the downstream flow of Becoming’s energy, infusing every individuated perspective with creative intent searching for perfection. And it accesses those perspectives from every angle that it can because that is most effective for the larger purposes that are feeding the stream. And on the other hand, we have individuated entities’ perspectives (points of Becoming’s attention) making choices about what is most perfect for them. There will be subtle preferences flowing from upstream, but it seems these may be overridden by the immediate downstream consciousness since that’s the place where perfection is being assessed and choices on perfection made. For choice to impact a particular frequency range, it must be focused to vibrate within that that frequency range.
Becoming will access all possible perspectives through each portal available. Each perspective, or portal, will generate its own observations and creative choices along the way. Though each “I” moves among a multitude of perspectives, it will generally be making its choices in the particular range of frequencies that it is most attuned to.
What is also true, in my experience, is that focused attention generates an energetic flow in the direction of my intent, and this current has attributes. Firstly, it changes intensity based on the level and duration of attention exerted. Becoming a lawyer, for example, requires longer and more intense attention than mowing the lawn. Thus, the higher intensity generates a broader and more significant flow.
Secondly, the generated flow does not end when my attention leaves it. It keeps flowing off into the surrounding energetic field on its original trajectory. Some flows are easy to detach from and others are not. For instance, most people have had the experience of eating at a restaurant and realizing they have had enough to eat before their plate is empty. They may even stop eating but will occasionally start picking at what’s left until it’s all gone, or just enough is left so that they can tell themselves that they didn’t eat all of it. That one is relatively easy to detach from compared, for instance, to missing an Olympic team you’ve trained years for.
So each generated flow has gravity of its own, and the more energy that I’ve put into it, the more that energetic wake will pull me in as it seemingly meanders off into the nearby energetic environment.

The manifested form of the “I AM” noted above could be considered the Holon of all holons in Koestler’s model. But from our own little holonic regions, I will point to what I have said before about a newborn. It is almost entirely unfocused on our perceived here-and-nowness at the moment that it is born. We are constantly bringing the newborn’s attention in the direction of our attention, and those frequency ranges that we are energetically habituated to. Practices such as yoga are intended to draw our attention back in the direction of the expanded awareness we had when we arrived in this place, while we hold onto the skills, capacities, and kinds of awareness that our portal of attention has developed while here.
Now onto another part of this frequency journey. I have been a consumer of astrophysics – for layman – nearly all of my adult life. In my limited knowledge of it, it appears to me that most of the measurable energy in the Universe oscillates. It is certain that the entire electromagnetic spectrum oscillates and we do measure gravitational waves.
In a book called Dark Energy and the Dinosaurs, astrophysicist Lisa Randall says that our solar system oscillates in the plane of the galaxy approximately once every 72 million years. From the frequency ranges that we inhabit here, an oscillation of that length will not be sensed at all. It could conceivably appear as abject stillness, but so would the spinning of the Earth and all energies between those two and beyond. They are far beyond the normal focal range of our attention.
On the microscale, imagine what you see pond life doing under a microscope along with their relative ranges. This happens to be a decent example of how I perceive my point of attention shifting from relatively faster frequencies to longer ones.
The long waveforms are relatively more still, and the thoughts and patterns embedded in the shorter ones become visible to awareness from that still, observer-like state. But I had never before thought of longer wavelengths, which I have long been beckoned toward, as perhaps the tendrils of a next larger holon. But the very notion of a singular sensings/perceiver aspect of consciousness has brought that forth now. This languaged notion is a useful access-way that is assisting me in reconnecting to this space. I am already becoming accustomed to how its leading edge feels and am finding myself more often shifting into this new experiential realm. It is an undulating and mutable region that I am now flowing in and out of. I am becoming able to see/feel the difference between the more personal orientations and the ones that are more like subtle inclinations of a present moment itself. There is likely both inflowing and outflowing aspects to this new state, but it’s way too early to sense any of that.
I have no idea what Ramana Maharshi’s experience was like. It does seem clear that in his expression of consciousness, the “I” awareness shifted “its” attention over a vast range of frequencies. Who knows what he could perceive. But it does appear to me, in this shifting moment, that to proceed into what is next we must give up the notion of a soul and a separate self, as he appears to have done, while still being able to move in and out of it. This will give us a measure of fluidity to more freely move about the Universe – to play and explore – both as an expanded, individuated entity and as the next larger holon’s energy field doing whatever it is already doing…and perhaps beyond.
I will end with the last line from Choice and Appreciation: Every act of creativity is to be shared and appreciated as a form of localized beautification/perfection of the energetic playground within which each aspect of consciousness has chosen to be focused.




and is thus visible in the newborn. That natural state of ours is always beckoning us back in its direction, via our fundamental resonance with our source “frequency neighborhood.” I suspect that this is much less noticeable for those whose choice to be here might have been particularly potent, who I also think are more likely to be extroverts. But we do all eventually leave this place and return in the direction of home, so that gravitation must be present to some degree.
The longer the wavelength, the slower I experience time passing and the faster the world around me seems to move, as was the case with my experiences with hallucinogens many decades ago. Like those experiences, there must be an increase in velocity to achieve the momentum needed to reach the longer ones. It’s a bit like using a manual transmission. You need to get the car moving at a certain speed in order to shift into the next gear. In this case, however, I have to gather a certain amount of momentum through a frequency range in order to stably reach a longer frequency range, in which my awareness is more expansive.
It has always seemed to me that the Observer is distinct from Being and Becoming. I have not read the entirety of their works, so perhaps don’t know what they have said about an Observer, if anything. But I think that the Observer stands on its own and does not seem to be included in the interplay of creative outflow and the allowing inflow. It might be said that it is Awareness, as it existed before the Big Bang, and therefore suffuses all of creation. Though that must be its origin, I think that the Observer is also an integral, and separate, part of the ongoing dancing of particulars that seems to be mostly credited to Being and Becoming, at least in what I have read. Using the excerpts above, I imagined this story that Becoming is creating the next most beautiful thing/experience in order to bring Joy to the beloved, Being. But Becoming feels insatiably creative to me. Perhaps it looks back to see if Being is satisfied with its most recent creation, yet its velocity, its exuberance to bring Joy, seems so unrestrained that pausing seems outside of its nature.